<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Jonathan Rawle&#039;s Website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathan.rawle.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathan.rawle.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 03:26:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Childish disrespect by Twitter</title>
		<link>http://jonathan.rawle.org/2013/04/11/childish-disrespect/#comment-221473</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 03:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathan.rawle.org/?p=287#comment-221473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most contradictive is who she&#039;s against is using her tax policy assertion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most contradictive is who she&#8217;s against is using her tax policy assertion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Postcodes in the UK by MikeW</title>
		<link>http://jonathan.rawle.org/2006/07/03/postcodes-in-the-uk/#comment-220190</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 10:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathan.rawle.org/2006/07/03/postcodes-in-the-uk/#comment-220190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On cross-border postcodes...

While nowadays, we tend to think of postcodes as belonging to a location (or vice-versa), the *original* purpose was for routing mail. Therefore, they don&#039;t show where a property *is* but instead tell Royal Mail how to route mail towards that property.

The first group of characters is used at the dispatch end - to indicate which delivery office the letter should be forwarded to.

The second group of characters is then used at the receiving office - essentially to indicate which postman gets to deliver the letter.

So if some Acottish properties get mail from an English sorting office, it gets an English postcode, and vice-versa.

Aberystwyth is a bit extreme though!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On cross-border postcodes&#8230;</p>
<p>While nowadays, we tend to think of postcodes as belonging to a location (or vice-versa), the *original* purpose was for routing mail. Therefore, they don&#8217;t show where a property *is* but instead tell Royal Mail how to route mail towards that property.</p>
<p>The first group of characters is used at the dispatch end &#8211; to indicate which delivery office the letter should be forwarded to.</p>
<p>The second group of characters is then used at the receiving office &#8211; essentially to indicate which postman gets to deliver the letter.</p>
<p>So if some Acottish properties get mail from an English sorting office, it gets an English postcode, and vice-versa.</p>
<p>Aberystwyth is a bit extreme though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Childish disrespect by Dave Brown</title>
		<link>http://jonathan.rawle.org/2013/04/11/childish-disrespect/#comment-219741</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 23:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathan.rawle.org/?p=287#comment-219741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I regard Thatcher as one of the most disastrous leaders that this country has had.   She applied a slash and burn policy to the aspects of society which she disliked and destroyed much which was good along with the problems.

But there is no way I would publicly celebrate her death.  And UI wish her supporters would return the  favour by not publicly celebrating her life.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I regard Thatcher as one of the most disastrous leaders that this country has had.   She applied a slash and burn policy to the aspects of society which she disliked and destroyed much which was good along with the problems.</p>
<p>But there is no way I would publicly celebrate her death.  And UI wish her supporters would return the  favour by not publicly celebrating her life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Postcodes in the UK by Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://jonathan.rawle.org/2006/07/03/postcodes-in-the-uk/#comment-219051</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 19:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathan.rawle.org/2006/07/03/postcodes-in-the-uk/#comment-219051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alan: I bet those residents are &quot;annoyed&quot; until you suggest that if they are in a different country they should be paying international postage rates. Then their views on a unified postal system might be slightly different.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan: I bet those residents are &#8220;annoyed&#8221; until you suggest that if they are in a different country they should be paying international postage rates. Then their views on a unified postal system might be slightly different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Postcodes in the UK by Alan</title>
		<link>http://jonathan.rawle.org/2006/07/03/postcodes-in-the-uk/#comment-219046</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 19:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathan.rawle.org/2006/07/03/postcodes-in-the-uk/#comment-219046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your last comment aboout cross border postcodes raises interesting if somewhat silly issues re Wales and England e.g Aberystwyth has a Shrewsbury postcode ( 75 miles away) - also lots of Welsh border towns are linked to a large English town - eg Weshpool is linked to Shrewsbury (Welshpool is quite small abt 10000 people but a proper town nevertheless.  

It does not seem logical to have cross country codes.  I believe the same issues affect England and Scotland border areas much to the annoyance of the residents.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your last comment aboout cross border postcodes raises interesting if somewhat silly issues re Wales and England e.g Aberystwyth has a Shrewsbury postcode ( 75 miles away) &#8211; also lots of Welsh border towns are linked to a large English town &#8211; eg Weshpool is linked to Shrewsbury (Welshpool is quite small abt 10000 people but a proper town nevertheless.  </p>
<p>It does not seem logical to have cross country codes.  I believe the same issues affect England and Scotland border areas much to the annoyance of the residents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not impressed by new Classic FM schedule by Jan</title>
		<link>http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-218025</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 08:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-218025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Mike, glad you found us! As you probably know already, Prokofiev&#039;s &quot;Classical Symphony&quot; has been in the HoF chart before, 2011 was the last time I believe, but definitely over the past few years the content of the chart has been changing dramatically. Personally, I can&#039;t understand why Chopin doesn&#039;t get much of a look-in, and it&#039;s absolutely criminal that Haydn and Mendelssohn only ever get a handful of entries each.

Perhaps the HoF could be split for the future: we could have a chart of contemporary &quot;classics&quot; where all the video music and some of the stuff written by people like Long, Hawes and Lord could go and then we could have a traditional classical music chart where the single criterion is that the composer must have been deceased for, say, at least 10 years. That would cut out a lot of the what I would term the &quot;modern music&quot;. However, if such music persisted in the popular psyche, so to speak, then obviously in due course it would become eligible to be voted into the traditional chart and I would be pleased to see it there, whether I liked the piece or not, because it had proved its endurance capability.

That would release many more chart positions for the more deserving, truly &quot;classical&quot; pieces. We might even see a re-entry of Prokofiev&#039;s &quot;Classical Symphony&quot; then!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike, glad you found us! As you probably know already, Prokofiev&#8217;s &#8220;Classical Symphony&#8221; has been in the HoF chart before, 2011 was the last time I believe, but definitely over the past few years the content of the chart has been changing dramatically. Personally, I can&#8217;t understand why Chopin doesn&#8217;t get much of a look-in, and it&#8217;s absolutely criminal that Haydn and Mendelssohn only ever get a handful of entries each.</p>
<p>Perhaps the HoF could be split for the future: we could have a chart of contemporary &#8220;classics&#8221; where all the video music and some of the stuff written by people like Long, Hawes and Lord could go and then we could have a traditional classical music chart where the single criterion is that the composer must have been deceased for, say, at least 10 years. That would cut out a lot of the what I would term the &#8220;modern music&#8221;. However, if such music persisted in the popular psyche, so to speak, then obviously in due course it would become eligible to be voted into the traditional chart and I would be pleased to see it there, whether I liked the piece or not, because it had proved its endurance capability.</p>
<p>That would release many more chart positions for the more deserving, truly &#8220;classical&#8221; pieces. We might even see a re-entry of Prokofiev&#8217;s &#8220;Classical Symphony&#8221; then!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not impressed by new Classic FM schedule by Robert Cutts</title>
		<link>http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-217999</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cutts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 06:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-217999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the advent of video-game music in its schedule, CFM is no longer exclusively classic – even in the broadest sense. And it hasn&#039;t been exclusively frequency modulated for quite a time. Thus &quot;Classic FM&quot; has become a misnomer. So what should it be called then? Answers on a postcard.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the advent of video-game music in its schedule, CFM is no longer exclusively classic – even in the broadest sense. And it hasn&#8217;t been exclusively frequency modulated for quite a time. Thus &#8220;Classic FM&#8221; has become a misnomer. So what should it be called then? Answers on a postcard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not impressed by new Classic FM schedule by Mike</title>
		<link>http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-217920</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 21:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-217920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fascinating posts here - just found this site.  Couple of random thoughts: I&#039;m amazed year after year at the HoF, not so much because of the relative rankings of pieces, but the things that get missed out - like Prokofiev&#039;s Classical Symphony amongst many others.  I wonder how many votes it takes to get something like that into the lower reaches of the chart??

The other thing I wonder about with CFM is who chooses which recording to play.  I didn&#039;t hear too much of the chart this year, but the disappointment of the weekend for me was the recording of Strauss&#039;s Four Last Songs - beautiful playing from the CBSO but hardly the greatest of sopranos!  A few weeks ago Jane Jones played Beethoven 9 - but the longest, most painful recording I&#039;ve ever heard (conducted by Karl Bohm).  Was almost as bad as the recording they played in the HoF chart last year (and that was BAD!).

If only CFM could get a presenter who could give intelligent commentary on recordings like Andrew McGregor on R3 (no prizes for guessing who I listen to on Saturday mornings).  I know David Mellor sometimes gives interesting insight into his music, but his.....  very strange... pauses...  in the middle of....   sentences drive me nuts.

Final thought - can all CFM presenters note that the higher of two entries is indeed the higher, not the highest!  I&#039;ll get off my soapbox now :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating posts here &#8211; just found this site.  Couple of random thoughts: I&#8217;m amazed year after year at the HoF, not so much because of the relative rankings of pieces, but the things that get missed out &#8211; like Prokofiev&#8217;s Classical Symphony amongst many others.  I wonder how many votes it takes to get something like that into the lower reaches of the chart??</p>
<p>The other thing I wonder about with CFM is who chooses which recording to play.  I didn&#8217;t hear too much of the chart this year, but the disappointment of the weekend for me was the recording of Strauss&#8217;s Four Last Songs &#8211; beautiful playing from the CBSO but hardly the greatest of sopranos!  A few weeks ago Jane Jones played Beethoven 9 &#8211; but the longest, most painful recording I&#8217;ve ever heard (conducted by Karl Bohm).  Was almost as bad as the recording they played in the HoF chart last year (and that was BAD!).</p>
<p>If only CFM could get a presenter who could give intelligent commentary on recordings like Andrew McGregor on R3 (no prizes for guessing who I listen to on Saturday mornings).  I know David Mellor sometimes gives interesting insight into his music, but his&#8230;..  very strange&#8230; pauses&#8230;  in the middle of&#8230;.   sentences drive me nuts.</p>
<p>Final thought &#8211; can all CFM presenters note that the higher of two entries is indeed the higher, not the highest!  I&#8217;ll get off my soapbox now <img src='http://jonathan.rawle.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not impressed by new Classic FM schedule by Jan</title>
		<link>http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-217762</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 06:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-217762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jonathan, thanks for posting that link. I’ve read your thoughts and I completely agree with them. You hit the nail on the head with your comment that those being encouraged to vote for certain “celebrity” pieces are voters being “bussed in”, as it were. These people haven’t considered the alternatives and thus they don’t have a reasonable range of music to choose from. Hitherto I was under the mistaken impression that the so-called “Hall of Fame” was just that: a place where the most well-known and consequently the best and most popular pieces of music were identified. The ones that had stood the test of time. It doesn’t necessarily have to preclude new pieces of music, the ones that Classic FM (or other classical music radio stations) play regularly, though I would expect these pieces to enter at a relatively low position and either gradually gain support through the years or (more likely) fall out again after a couple of appearances.

I do not expect some video game music to be regarded as somehow “more popular” than Beethoven’s 5th piano concerto or Mozart’s clarinet concerto. The idea is just ludicrous. As you rightly point out, Jonathan, the “Hall of Fame” is not a pop chart. It was supposed to be to be a testing of the nation’s classical music tastes. It’s stopped being that. If Classic FM or groups of others are actively campaigning for hitherto unknown pieces of music to be shot straight to the top of the chart then the “Hall of Fame” loses both its meaning and its importance. We’re at the stage now where we don’t really know which is the most popular pieces of classical music because the numbers have been distorted by the inclusion of this (probably) ephemeral video game music so, like Jonathan, I believe we’ve reached the stage where it’s time to abandon the “Hall of Fame” because it is fast becoming a laughing-stock.

I, too, didn’t listen much to the countdown. I would say that I heard at most about a couple of hours of it whereas in previous years I have had a radio on in every room so that as I worked through the day I wouldn’t miss a single track. It used to be a wonderful experience, having wall-to-wall, superb classical music, many pieces I loved to listen to, some pieces I had half-forgotten, and others that were slowly becoming favourites. I shall not be listening at all next year, it will be a non-event for me. I do think that CFM has lost the plot. And I’m very sad about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan, thanks for posting that link. I’ve read your thoughts and I completely agree with them. You hit the nail on the head with your comment that those being encouraged to vote for certain “celebrity” pieces are voters being “bussed in”, as it were. These people haven’t considered the alternatives and thus they don’t have a reasonable range of music to choose from. Hitherto I was under the mistaken impression that the so-called “Hall of Fame” was just that: a place where the most well-known and consequently the best and most popular pieces of music were identified. The ones that had stood the test of time. It doesn’t necessarily have to preclude new pieces of music, the ones that Classic FM (or other classical music radio stations) play regularly, though I would expect these pieces to enter at a relatively low position and either gradually gain support through the years or (more likely) fall out again after a couple of appearances.</p>
<p>I do not expect some video game music to be regarded as somehow “more popular” than Beethoven’s 5th piano concerto or Mozart’s clarinet concerto. The idea is just ludicrous. As you rightly point out, Jonathan, the “Hall of Fame” is not a pop chart. It was supposed to be to be a testing of the nation’s classical music tastes. It’s stopped being that. If Classic FM or groups of others are actively campaigning for hitherto unknown pieces of music to be shot straight to the top of the chart then the “Hall of Fame” loses both its meaning and its importance. We’re at the stage now where we don’t really know which is the most popular pieces of classical music because the numbers have been distorted by the inclusion of this (probably) ephemeral video game music so, like Jonathan, I believe we’ve reached the stage where it’s time to abandon the “Hall of Fame” because it is fast becoming a laughing-stock.</p>
<p>I, too, didn’t listen much to the countdown. I would say that I heard at most about a couple of hours of it whereas in previous years I have had a radio on in every room so that as I worked through the day I wouldn’t miss a single track. It used to be a wonderful experience, having wall-to-wall, superb classical music, many pieces I loved to listen to, some pieces I had half-forgotten, and others that were slowly becoming favourites. I shall not be listening at all next year, it will be a non-event for me. I do think that CFM has lost the plot. And I’m very sad about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not impressed by new Classic FM schedule by Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-217440</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 22:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-217440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://jonathan.rawle.org/2012/04/09/classical-music-poll-descends-into-farce/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This post&lt;/a&gt; was my take on it last year. This year it seems to be even more extreme. I wouldn&#039;t mind Classic FM including a few symphonic pieces from games in their schedule as they do with film music, but these campaigns urging people to vote for particular pieces when those people might never listen to Classic FM nor have any interest in classical music just spoils the chart for all the other listeners. As it was, I hardly listened to the countdown this year, and I doubt I&#039;ll listen at all next year. With social media so prevalent, they either need to tighten the criteria, or else give the Hall of Fame a rest. To be honest, it&#039;s becoming a bit past its sell-by-date anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://jonathan.rawle.org/2012/04/09/classical-music-poll-descends-into-farce/" rel="nofollow">This post</a> was my take on it last year. This year it seems to be even more extreme. I wouldn&#8217;t mind Classic FM including a few symphonic pieces from games in their schedule as they do with film music, but these campaigns urging people to vote for particular pieces when those people might never listen to Classic FM nor have any interest in classical music just spoils the chart for all the other listeners. As it was, I hardly listened to the countdown this year, and I doubt I&#8217;ll listen at all next year. With social media so prevalent, they either need to tighten the criteria, or else give the Hall of Fame a rest. To be honest, it&#8217;s becoming a bit past its sell-by-date anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
