<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Jonathan Rawle's Website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathan.rawle.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathan.rawle.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 04:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Guestbook by Iain</title>
		<link>http://jonathan.rawle.org/guestbook/#comment-125088</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathan.rawle.org/guestbook/#comment-125088</guid>
		<description>Site found by: google

Hi just needed somewhere to vent my spleen about trainline!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Site found by: google</p>
<p>Hi just needed somewhere to vent my spleen about trainline!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to avoid TheTrainLine fees by Iain</title>
		<link>http://jonathan.rawle.org/2007/12/31/how-to-avoid-thetrainline-fees/#comment-125087</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathan.rawle.org/2007/12/31/how-to-avoid-thetrainline-fees/#comment-125087</guid>
		<description>I have recently paid for a ticket with with a debit card and they insisted that I had paid with a credit card, incurring a £2.50 fee. I have to send them my bank statement to claim the money back. How many other people have they caught out with this scam and how much are they raking in from those who don't reclaim the money or the interest they earn on it all?  I bet it happens too often for it to be a mistake!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have recently paid for a ticket with with a debit card and they insisted that I had paid with a credit card, incurring a £2.50 fee. I have to send them my bank statement to claim the money back. How many other people have they caught out with this scam and how much are they raking in from those who don&#8217;t reclaim the money or the interest they earn on it all?  I bet it happens too often for it to be a mistake!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not impressed by new Classic FM schedule by Jan</title>
		<link>http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-125000</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 07:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-125000</guid>
		<description>How odd. Peter wonders when Mozart’s Requiem was last played on Classic FM, and yet it seems to me that whenever Mozart has any kind of substantial presence on an evening concert (or the newly-named ‘Full Works’) they always play the Requiem. Indeed, it is down to be played next week when during the so-called ‘Great Composers’ month they are dedicating a show to Mozart. I find it astonishing that it gets played so much, bearing in mind that some of it isn’t his anyway.

They do play Sibelius’s symphonies also; a movement from one of them was aired earlier this week. I daresay that when he gets his slot on the ‘Full Works’ this month he will have one or two symphonies played. But I think it is right that CFM concentrates on the more popular works: these pieces of music are popular for a good reason, i.e. they are the ‘masterpieces’ and are more likely than others to attract new listeners. Once a listener is hooked, then he or she will probably explore further on their own. I did. 

I agree with Sylvia that CFM does play a lot of music by people relatively unknown. For example, back in the early days when I first started listening all I knew about were the big names, and that was all I wanted to hear. But I am eternally grateful that CFM introduced me to Hummel, whom I now love, to the work of John Field and John Garth, and to the lesser-known pieces by composers like Bizet (I found out that he did write something other than Carmen) and they even persuaded me to like Shostakovich and Borodin!

Admittedly I think they play far too many film scores, and it is rare indeed – as Philip points out – to get a piece of music of any length (outside the ‘Full Works’). Many of my favourites are too long for frequent playing, e.g. the first movement of Beethoven’s fifth piano concerto, the first of his violin concerto, the Choral Fantasy, the first of Tchaikovsky’s piano concerto no 1. Mozart gets played so often not only because he consistently gets voted the listeners’ favourite, but because the segments of his work tend to be shorter. (And what gems they are!)

As for the adverts – well! Perhaps they would not irritate so much if there was more of a variety of them. And I do wish they wouldn’t plug ‘Smooth Classics at Six’ so much or indeed use their self-adverts to sandwich together two pieces of music. Not all of us have access to a DAB radio all the time: it is nice to be told the identity of what has just been played if you turn the radio on halfway through. Having to wait for that information while yet more music is played is unacceptable. (Especially if the next piece is something you don’t like!)

But the classics are back at midnight, and I’m still smiling.

Jan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How odd. Peter wonders when Mozart’s Requiem was last played on Classic FM, and yet it seems to me that whenever Mozart has any kind of substantial presence on an evening concert (or the newly-named ‘Full Works’) they always play the Requiem. Indeed, it is down to be played next week when during the so-called ‘Great Composers’ month they are dedicating a show to Mozart. I find it astonishing that it gets played so much, bearing in mind that some of it isn’t his anyway.</p>
<p>They do play Sibelius’s symphonies also; a movement from one of them was aired earlier this week. I daresay that when he gets his slot on the ‘Full Works’ this month he will have one or two symphonies played. But I think it is right that CFM concentrates on the more popular works: these pieces of music are popular for a good reason, i.e. they are the ‘masterpieces’ and are more likely than others to attract new listeners. Once a listener is hooked, then he or she will probably explore further on their own. I did. </p>
<p>I agree with Sylvia that CFM does play a lot of music by people relatively unknown. For example, back in the early days when I first started listening all I knew about were the big names, and that was all I wanted to hear. But I am eternally grateful that CFM introduced me to Hummel, whom I now love, to the work of John Field and John Garth, and to the lesser-known pieces by composers like Bizet (I found out that he did write something other than Carmen) and they even persuaded me to like Shostakovich and Borodin!</p>
<p>Admittedly I think they play far too many film scores, and it is rare indeed – as Philip points out – to get a piece of music of any length (outside the ‘Full Works’). Many of my favourites are too long for frequent playing, e.g. the first movement of Beethoven’s fifth piano concerto, the first of his violin concerto, the Choral Fantasy, the first of Tchaikovsky’s piano concerto no 1. Mozart gets played so often not only because he consistently gets voted the listeners’ favourite, but because the segments of his work tend to be shorter. (And what gems they are!)</p>
<p>As for the adverts – well! Perhaps they would not irritate so much if there was more of a variety of them. And I do wish they wouldn’t plug ‘Smooth Classics at Six’ so much or indeed use their self-adverts to sandwich together two pieces of music. Not all of us have access to a DAB radio all the time: it is nice to be told the identity of what has just been played if you turn the radio on halfway through. Having to wait for that information while yet more music is played is unacceptable. (Especially if the next piece is something you don’t like!)</p>
<p>But the classics are back at midnight, and I’m still smiling.</p>
<p>Jan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not impressed by new Classic FM schedule by sylvia ross</title>
		<link>http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-124892</link>
		<dc:creator>sylvia ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-124892</guid>
		<description>Bach`s Toccata and Fugue is due to be played next Tuesday (14) on the Full works concert.  I agree with you about The Swan of Tuonela, but I`ve certainly heard part of Sibeius`s Symphony no 2 recently, and Nick Bailey played the lovely Ballade from the Karelia suite recently. But I`ve never once heard the towering Tapiola played on CFM!  I also agree with you there is far too much film music played - I don`t consider this classical.  You should not dismiss Dusek just bcause you`ve not heard of him - he`s well worth a listen.  As for the ads I hate them all, but unfortunately as with all commercial radio stations, they are a neccessary evil!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bach`s Toccata and Fugue is due to be played next Tuesday (14) on the Full works concert.  I agree with you about The Swan of Tuonela, but I`ve certainly heard part of Sibeius`s Symphony no 2 recently, and Nick Bailey played the lovely Ballade from the Karelia suite recently. But I`ve never once heard the towering Tapiola played on CFM!  I also agree with you there is far too much film music played - I don`t consider this classical.  You should not dismiss Dusek just bcause you`ve not heard of him - he`s well worth a listen.  As for the ads I hate them all, but unfortunately as with all commercial radio stations, they are a neccessary evil!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not impressed by new Classic FM schedule by Philip Platts</title>
		<link>http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-124828</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Platts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 08:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-124828</guid>
		<description>Referring to Peter's email, my own favourite piece is Tchaikovsky's magnificent Romeo and Juliet Fantasy Overture, and there are many others who put that in their top 3, as evidenced by its appearance year after year in their Hall of Fame (which I accept is nonsensical e.g. Pirates of the Caribbean being higher up than Mozart etc) However, the R&#38;J Fantasy almost never gets played because it's about 20 minutes long and can't be split into movements, and they can't get it into their scheduling very easily.

I now automatically recoil when I hear those ads advertising the benefits of advertising on radio, with that idiot interviewing perfectly sane heads of businesses and putting a pun into every question. Ughhh. Does anyone at all find those funny?

Phil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Referring to Peter&#8217;s email, my own favourite piece is Tchaikovsky&#8217;s magnificent Romeo and Juliet Fantasy Overture, and there are many others who put that in their top 3, as evidenced by its appearance year after year in their Hall of Fame (which I accept is nonsensical e.g. Pirates of the Caribbean being higher up than Mozart etc) However, the R&amp;J Fantasy almost never gets played because it&#8217;s about 20 minutes long and can&#8217;t be split into movements, and they can&#8217;t get it into their scheduling very easily.</p>
<p>I now automatically recoil when I hear those ads advertising the benefits of advertising on radio, with that idiot interviewing perfectly sane heads of businesses and putting a pun into every question. Ughhh. Does anyone at all find those funny?</p>
<p>Phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not impressed by new Classic FM schedule by Peter</title>
		<link>http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-124777</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-124777</guid>
		<description>I know nothing about Dusek. What I do know is that there are some excellent famous composers, eg, Sibelius, where they just tend to play the same piece over and over, - Karelia Suite 3rd movement. Whatever happened to his 2nd Symphony? When did that ever get an airing on CFM. It made the top 150 Hall of Fame, or his Swan of Tuelona? When did Mozart's Requiem last get played, Bach's Toccata &#38; Fugue D minor, etc? There are countless other examples. Playing lots of film score music repetitively instead, much of it very mediocre, at the expense of the classical works, is no substitute for the real thing. Personally I'd much rather listen to jazz anytime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know nothing about Dusek. What I do know is that there are some excellent famous composers, eg, Sibelius, where they just tend to play the same piece over and over, - Karelia Suite 3rd movement. Whatever happened to his 2nd Symphony? When did that ever get an airing on CFM. It made the top 150 Hall of Fame, or his Swan of Tuelona? When did Mozart&#8217;s Requiem last get played, Bach&#8217;s Toccata &amp; Fugue D minor, etc? There are countless other examples. Playing lots of film score music repetitively instead, much of it very mediocre, at the expense of the classical works, is no substitute for the real thing. Personally I&#8217;d much rather listen to jazz anytime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not impressed by new Classic FM schedule by sylvia ross</title>
		<link>http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-124590</link>
		<dc:creator>sylvia ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-124590</guid>
		<description>Peter, I cannot agree that CFM is all Eine Kleine Nachtmusik, Four Seasons, Pirates of the Caribbean and Karl Jenkins (all of which I like anyway).  I have heard stuff on CFM which I would never even know about.  For example they`ve been playing quite a lot lately of Czech composer Dusek`s piano music - it`s sublime.  I`ve also heard Von Bronsart, and just now I heard on Smooth Classcs at Six - Haydn`s Symphony 49, Ist movement - divine.  They play a lot of Schubert`s chamber music - I`d never heard of Death and the Maiden until recently.  The Albinoni oboe concerto`s are getting quite an airing - they`re delightful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, I cannot agree that CFM is all Eine Kleine Nachtmusik, Four Seasons, Pirates of the Caribbean and Karl Jenkins (all of which I like anyway).  I have heard stuff on CFM which I would never even know about.  For example they`ve been playing quite a lot lately of Czech composer Dusek`s piano music - it`s sublime.  I`ve also heard Von Bronsart, and just now I heard on Smooth Classcs at Six - Haydn`s Symphony 49, Ist movement - divine.  They play a lot of Schubert`s chamber music - I`d never heard of Death and the Maiden until recently.  The Albinoni oboe concerto`s are getting quite an airing - they`re delightful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not impressed by new Classic FM schedule by Philip Platts</title>
		<link>http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-124458</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Platts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 19:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-124458</guid>
		<description>I too agree totally with Jan's comments.

For the first time I can remember, I did feel sorry for Classic FM's producers when there was a mini wave of support for the jazz programme on this website (or rather, dismay at its disappearance). It proves you can't please all the people all the time. Although I respect the views of these correspondents, I must say that the removal of the jazz was more a problem for the jazz lovers to sort out rather than the classical music fans having to put up with jazz on a station that was supposed to have been set up to play classical music (in fact CFM used to plug themselves as the only 24 hour a day classical music station). Anyway the jazz lovers, as Jan points out, will now be much happier as they have their own station back (wonder what their listeners would say if they stuck a classical music programme in there!)

Nevertheless there's still much to be done before Classic FM gets anywhere near the standard they attained some years ago. And I agree that Mark Griffiths coming back would be one step in the right direction.

Phil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too agree totally with Jan&#8217;s comments.</p>
<p>For the first time I can remember, I did feel sorry for Classic FM&#8217;s producers when there was a mini wave of support for the jazz programme on this website (or rather, dismay at its disappearance). It proves you can&#8217;t please all the people all the time. Although I respect the views of these correspondents, I must say that the removal of the jazz was more a problem for the jazz lovers to sort out rather than the classical music fans having to put up with jazz on a station that was supposed to have been set up to play classical music (in fact CFM used to plug themselves as the only 24 hour a day classical music station). Anyway the jazz lovers, as Jan points out, will now be much happier as they have their own station back (wonder what their listeners would say if they stuck a classical music programme in there!)</p>
<p>Nevertheless there&#8217;s still much to be done before Classic FM gets anywhere near the standard they attained some years ago. And I agree that Mark Griffiths coming back would be one step in the right direction.</p>
<p>Phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not impressed by new Classic FM schedule by Nancy</title>
		<link>http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-124414</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 14:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-124414</guid>
		<description>Jan

So very well put.  Let's keep our fingers crossed that things continue to improve.

Nancy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jan</p>
<p>So very well put.  Let&#8217;s keep our fingers crossed that things continue to improve.</p>
<p>Nancy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not impressed by new Classic FM schedule by Jan Smith</title>
		<link>http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-124384</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 09:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathan.rawle.org/2008/02/29/not-impressed-by-new-classic-fm-schedule/#comment-124384</guid>
		<description>Wow! Classic FM has surprised us all again! Gone is Jazz! Three cheers and a knighthood for whoever persuaded them to do that! Sorry about all the exclamation marks but I am truly, really delighted and a glut of exclamation marks appears to be in order.

I disagree with Lionel over his suggestion that perhaps the two hours after midnight is ‘the natural domain’ of jazz lovers; I don’t think people can be pigeon-holed so easily, and their listening habits predicted. Personally speaking, I listen to more classical music at night than at any other time. I work full-time and rarely get a chance during the day, and the weekends are always dominated by family stuff, so those precious dark hours are bliss for me when I can turn on the radio and hear classical music. 

However, all is not lost for you jazzers. Tune in to Jazz FM and have your music all the time. It is in your best interest to make the most of the relaunch, and you can do yourselves a favour – and us too – by making Jazz FM a runaway success.

I’m with Josh in hoping that Ms Taylor will be ushered to the door and I do think that the movement of programmes at the weekend was unforgivable. I used to listen to David Mellor’s new CD show (he has strange staccato delivery, but I appreciated his very honest opinions) but now I can’t, and I do know that Natalie Wheen’s new time-slot has been deplored by many of her listeners. 

Mark Griffiths now broadcasts on China Radio International. I don’t know about the details of his contract, but I rather suspect that if it were at all possible he would be back at Classic FM like a shot. Although I love Nick Bailey, I would prefer to see Mark back at his ‘normal’ time, and Nick given back the Evening Concert. The title ‘Full Works’ is pretty tacky, and John Brunning – though clear and concise – is rather too impersonal for my taste. Nick’s warmth (an attribute of Mark also) added immeasurably to the show.

Having said all that, we have had a step in the right direction with the reinstatement of classical music after midnight, so let us classical music lovers rejoice.....

Jan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Classic FM has surprised us all again! Gone is Jazz! Three cheers and a knighthood for whoever persuaded them to do that! Sorry about all the exclamation marks but I am truly, really delighted and a glut of exclamation marks appears to be in order.</p>
<p>I disagree with Lionel over his suggestion that perhaps the two hours after midnight is ‘the natural domain’ of jazz lovers; I don’t think people can be pigeon-holed so easily, and their listening habits predicted. Personally speaking, I listen to more classical music at night than at any other time. I work full-time and rarely get a chance during the day, and the weekends are always dominated by family stuff, so those precious dark hours are bliss for me when I can turn on the radio and hear classical music. </p>
<p>However, all is not lost for you jazzers. Tune in to Jazz FM and have your music all the time. It is in your best interest to make the most of the relaunch, and you can do yourselves a favour – and us too – by making Jazz FM a runaway success.</p>
<p>I’m with Josh in hoping that Ms Taylor will be ushered to the door and I do think that the movement of programmes at the weekend was unforgivable. I used to listen to David Mellor’s new CD show (he has strange staccato delivery, but I appreciated his very honest opinions) but now I can’t, and I do know that Natalie Wheen’s new time-slot has been deplored by many of her listeners. </p>
<p>Mark Griffiths now broadcasts on China Radio International. I don’t know about the details of his contract, but I rather suspect that if it were at all possible he would be back at Classic FM like a shot. Although I love Nick Bailey, I would prefer to see Mark back at his ‘normal’ time, and Nick given back the Evening Concert. The title ‘Full Works’ is pretty tacky, and John Brunning – though clear and concise – is rather too impersonal for my taste. Nick’s warmth (an attribute of Mark also) added immeasurably to the show.</p>
<p>Having said all that, we have had a step in the right direction with the reinstatement of classical music after midnight, so let us classical music lovers rejoice&#8230;..</p>
<p>Jan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
